Evaluation+Rubric

An 'At a Glance' rating system has also been developed and a 4 to 1 rating will be allocated to 4 specific areas; **Content, Credibility, Usefulness,** and **Navigation and ease of use**. Please look at the evaluation criteria for these ratings in the table below:

‍Rating System & Evaluation Criteria:
|| **3 - Good** || **2 - Satisfactory** || **1 - Poor** ||
 * **Category** || **4 -** **Excellent**
 * **Content** || Well-organized, accurate information, no errors. Clearly-stated purpose and theme. || The site organized with most of the information is accurate. Has clearly-stated purpose and theme || The site is organized... the purpose and theme somewhat vague and confusing. || Not well-organized. Lacks purpose and theme. ||
 * **Credibility** || Author(s) of the material is clearly identified. Multiple sources of contact information listed (ie..email, phone, blog) || Author(s) of most the material is clearly identified. One source of contact information listed. || Author(s) of some of the material is identified. Contact information missing. || No contact information is listed. Author is not listed throughout the web page. ||
 * **Usefulness** || Has sufficient information related to teachers' needs and purposes. || Includes essential information. Subject knowledge appears to be related to teacher's needs and purposes. || Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors. || Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors. ||
 * **Navigation and ease of use** || Links clearly labeled. Can easily move from a page to a related page. User does not get lost. Can be opened with any major browser. || The site was somewhat easy to navigate and most links / downloads worked smoothly || Navigating the site was confusing and some links / downloads worked smoothly || Some links do not take user to the sites described. A user typically feels lost. ||